Photoshop's naming scheme was initially based on version numbers. Its feature set can be expanded by plug-ins programs developed and distributed independently of Photoshop that run inside it and offer new or enhanced features. In addition to raster graphics, Photoshop has limited abilities to edit or render text and vector graphics (especially through clipping path for the latter), as well as 3D graphics and video. Photoshop uses its own PSD and PSB file formats to support these features. Photoshop can edit and compose raster images in multiple layers and supports masks, alpha compositing and several color models. "to photoshop an image", " photoshopping", and " photoshop contest") although Adobe discourages such use. The software's name is often colloquially used as a verb (e.g. Since then, the software has become the most used tool for professional digital art, especially in raster graphics editing. It was originally created in 1987 by Thomas and John Knoll. I'd rather Topaz simply watermark the demo images and let the trial run indefinitely.American English, British English, Arabic, Mandarin Chinese, Chinese Traditional, Czech, Danish, Dutch, Finnish, French, German, Hebrew, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Romanian, Turkish and UkrainianĪdobe Photoshop is a raster graphics editor developed and published by Adobe Inc. Given how slow it is, I'm not sure 30 days is a long enough trial time. So for me, the jury is still out as to whether I might add this new resize tool to my digital bag of tricks, but at $100 per seat, I think I would need to study it much harder before handing over money. Grain/noise is better controlled at the resize step in Topaz AIG, but I'm used to handling those aspects of noise reduction with other methods rather than trying to get it all done at the resize step. The long side of the image should have turned out 12,000 pixels, but ended up under 10,000 according to PS, so I couldn't compare the PS converted image to the Topaz converted image precisely since the screen viewing magnifications had to differ in order to look at the two images arranged side by side at similar size in photoshop. Also, I set the resize to custom and defined inches on the long side at 300dpi, but the resized image came out a different size. On one image I tried, I did think it did a little better than PS, but on a second image PS (preserve details 2) produced a decidedly more realistic result, Topaz AIG turning certain areas of a flower petal image into slightly mushy tonal transitions that lost photo realistic quality in favor of a more obvious "digitally painted look". I'm personally OK with a long process time if I can routinely get a better result. What's up with that?Īlso, due to its long processing time for a single uprez as everyone has noted (several minutes on my 2013 MacPro) it's going to be time-consuming to really run this new resize method through its paces, and likely to be somewhat of a statistical game. The change in color and tone, albeit not enormous, is still noticeable, and would add even more editing time to my image prep to bring the image colors and tones back to where they started. The image is part of a 5Ds image scaled up by 600% with two different settings There is a 30 day free trial of the software, but I'm not sure Topaz have fully updated their site yet. You still need a good source image -)Īnyway, I've written up some notes of more tests and experiments. Of course, it won't fix bad exposure, focus, composition etc. I found that choice of RAW converter and sharpening/NR settings can make a difference to the final results. It's interesting - I've already used it for re-processing a 1Ds3 image for a 36 x 24 print and it gave a cleaner looking print - actually more like as if I'd used my 5Ds for the shot. I've tried it on images from 4.9MP Olympus E-20 ones to 50MP ones from my 5Ds and the results are very reasonable - easily visible in prints. I've been testing a pre-release version, which apart my making my Mac run like treacle for a few minutes is an interesting addition to my resizing options. Ignoring my "Oh no, another way of resizing images" thoughts, I've been trying out their new rescaling software that makes use of your graphics cards processing power to do a somewhat different style of resizing. I was recently asked to have a look at some new Topaz software specifically aimed at making big enlargements. After quite a few years of making big prints, I recall some of the heated debates here in the past about 'best' resizing techniques and software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |